Strategic Experimentation is Decision Quality - Not Failed AI PoCs
- 3h
- 1 min read
Analysts frequently report that 65–95% of AI proof-of-concept (PoC) initiatives never reach production. On the surface, that sounds alarming. In a regulated environment, it may be the opposite.
Click the image to download the PDF.
In a regulated environment, a "failed" PoC can be successful audit of risk.
A £50k controlled experiment that prevents a £2m scaled implementation failure is not waste. It is capital discipline.
The question boards should be asking is not: “Why are so many failing?”.
But rather:
• Were hypotheses explicitly defined?
• Were model, operational and conduct risks bounded?
• Were exit criteria agreed in advance?
• Did governance participate from day one?
• Did the exercise generate decision-grade evidence?
If the answer to those questions is yes, then termination is not failure.
It is evidence of:
🔹Risk containment
🔹Learning velocity
🔹Capital protection
🔹Institutional maturity
The real risk is not a high PoC attrition rate.
The real risk is scaling systems that were never rigorously challenged.
Failure rate is an easy headline metric.
Decision quality is the one that matters.



